Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5311 - 5320 of 68466 for did.
Search results 5311 - 5320 of 68466 for did.
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2496 - 2005-03-31
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2496 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl Andre Brown
that statements of others did not support his alibi. Brown then told police he had gone along on a planned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
that statements of others did not support his alibi. Brown then told police he had gone along on a planned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Hess
to withdraw his no contest plea on the ground that he did not understand the nature of the charge; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20
to withdraw his no contest plea on the ground that he did not understand the nature of the charge; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Gerald P. Ptacek after he did work on the waterway without a permit or an exemption. Vogt claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86804 - 2014-09-15
. Gerald P. Ptacek after he did work on the waterway without a permit or an exemption. Vogt claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86804 - 2014-09-15
Elizabeth D. Swenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
of Swenson’s fear of spinal collapse should not have been admitted because the evidence did not satisfy a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31
of Swenson’s fear of spinal collapse should not have been admitted because the evidence did not satisfy a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shawn A. Timm
because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain him. We agree. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4847 - 2017-09-19
because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain him. We agree. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4847 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
contract between counsel and the State Public Defender’s office, and (2) his trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
contract between counsel and the State Public Defender’s office, and (2) his trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12448 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
order. Keri moved to dismiss on the grounds that the family court orders did not contain required TPR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27265 - 2006-11-27
order. Keri moved to dismiss on the grounds that the family court orders did not contain required TPR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27265 - 2006-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to prove her mental state. We conclude that Bilton did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
to prove her mental state. We conclude that Bilton did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Shawn E. Braxton
, however, that he did not agree to the date of a prior conviction which triggered the enhancements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2900 - 2017-09-19
, however, that he did not agree to the date of a prior conviction which triggered the enhancements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2900 - 2017-09-19