Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5311 - 5320 of 69092 for he.
Search results 5311 - 5320 of 69092 for he.
State v. Yathzee D. Inman
he was waived into adult court. In this appeal from the judgment of conviction and an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
he was waived into adult court. In this appeal from the judgment of conviction and an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric T. Scott
.[1] In this consolidated appeal, Eric Scott proceeds pro se. He challenges the circuit court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17891 - 2005-05-02
.[1] In this consolidated appeal, Eric Scott proceeds pro se. He challenges the circuit court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17891 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentence, and he asked that the sentence run concurrently with a twenty-two- month sentence that had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42141 - 2014-09-15
sentence, and he asked that the sentence run concurrently with a twenty-two- month sentence that had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42141 - 2014-09-15
Village of Hales Corners v. Bruce E. Larson
the complaint. According to Officer Cera’s testimony, he heard the dog bark for “perhaps two minutes” before he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5926 - 2005-03-31
the complaint. According to Officer Cera’s testimony, he heard the dog bark for “perhaps two minutes” before he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5926 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court order denying his motion for sentence modification. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260975 - 2020-05-19
court order denying his motion for sentence modification. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260975 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial in the interest of justice because he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59509 - 2014-09-15
. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial in the interest of justice because he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59509 - 2014-09-15
State v. Stuart M. Buzzell
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J.M.
Christensen was the only witness to testify at the suppression hearing. He stated that on May 8, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
Christensen was the only witness to testify at the suppression hearing. He stated that on May 8, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stuart M. Buzzell
-CR 2 (OWI) contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3494 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 (OWI) contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3494 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
-degree intentional homicide. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30830 - 2014-09-15
-degree intentional homicide. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30830 - 2014-09-15