Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53131 - 53140 of 67952 for law.
Search results 53131 - 53140 of 67952 for law.
State v. Barbara J. Anderson
a question of law which we review without deference to the trial court. Id. ¶5 A “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4336 - 2005-03-31
a question of law which we review without deference to the trial court. Id. ¶5 A “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4336 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing, it is unlikely that the trial judge was not aware that the law had been changed. Mejia has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116919 - 2014-07-14
sentencing, it is unlikely that the trial judge was not aware that the law had been changed. Mejia has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116919 - 2014-07-14
CA Blank Order
, there are multiple cases holding that changes in sentencing laws do not satisfy the test for a new sentencing factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102254 - 2013-09-22
, there are multiple cases holding that changes in sentencing laws do not satisfy the test for a new sentencing factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102254 - 2013-09-22
State v. Norman O. Brown
prior convictions because Brown’s ability to reform and abide by the criminal law was not being tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16049 - 2005-03-31
prior convictions because Brown’s ability to reform and abide by the criminal law was not being tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16049 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of imprisonment is within the maximum twelve-year range authorized by law, see State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI App 265
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
of imprisonment is within the maximum twelve-year range authorized by law, see State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI App 265
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because of abuse, neglect, abandonment, or other similar basis under state law. Specifically, Roman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059113 - 2026-01-05
because of abuse, neglect, abandonment, or other similar basis under state law. Specifically, Roman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059113 - 2026-01-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Neillsville, WI 54456 John C. Bachman John Bachman Law Office P.O. Box 477 Eau Claire, WI 54702
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132066 - 2017-09-21
Neillsville, WI 54456 John C. Bachman John Bachman Law Office P.O. Box 477 Eau Claire, WI 54702
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132066 - 2017-09-21
Teri S. Clarkson v. Dale E. Clarkson
, whether Clarkson demonstrated a substantial change of circumstances is a question of law, which we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7610 - 2005-03-31
, whether Clarkson demonstrated a substantial change of circumstances is a question of law, which we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7610 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig L. Miller
the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions if they are not identical in law and fact.[2] See State v. Carol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3345 - 2005-03-31
the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions if they are not identical in law and fact.[2] See State v. Carol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3345 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI App 34
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28440 - 2007-03-11
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28440 - 2007-03-11