Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53141 - 53150 of 82381 for judgment for m s.
Search results 53141 - 53150 of 82381 for judgment for m s.
COURT OF APPEALS
further review from the circuit court, requesting that the court set aside the judgment and findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14
further review from the circuit court, requesting that the court set aside the judgment and findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
exercising reasonable professional judgment, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39849 - 2014-09-15
exercising reasonable professional judgment, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in and in accordance with 806.07, which is a motion for relief from a judgment or order. Based on the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500315 - 2022-03-30
in and in accordance with 806.07, which is a motion for relief from a judgment or order. Based on the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500315 - 2022-03-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
neither reversed it nor disapproved our analysis. Trial counsel “ha[s] no Strickland responsibility
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362377 - 2021-05-04
neither reversed it nor disapproved our analysis. Trial counsel “ha[s] no Strickland responsibility
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362377 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
David L. Gilbert v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
for redetermination. ¶5 On November 23, 1998, Gilbert filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2903 - 2017-09-19
for redetermination. ¶5 On November 23, 1998, Gilbert filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2903 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment for that of the trier of fact unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=892735 - 2024-12-26
judgment for that of the trier of fact unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=892735 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
Danny Prince Hall v. Gerald Berge
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13510 - 2017-09-21
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13510 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Falls, WI 54615-1776 Daniel S. Diehn District Attorney 307 Main St. Black River Falls, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348653 - 2021-03-25
Falls, WI 54615-1776 Daniel S. Diehn District Attorney 307 Main St. Black River Falls, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348653 - 2021-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granted summary judgment to the DOR, finding that Becker did not meet his burden to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681362 - 2023-07-25
granted summary judgment to the DOR, finding that Becker did not meet his burden to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681362 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Ruiz
plea after sentencing, [the defendant] need[s] to establish by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21
plea after sentencing, [the defendant] need[s] to establish by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21