Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
NOTICE
an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49540 - 2014-09-15
an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49540 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Norman D. Stapleton
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2597 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2597 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
requires an application of WIS. STAT. § 939.74(4). This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29108 - 2014-09-15
requires an application of WIS. STAT. § 939.74(4). This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29108 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605810 - 2023-01-04
are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605810 - 2023-01-04
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Clifton Hampton
in jail. Hampton petitioned the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9084 - 2017-09-19
in jail. Hampton petitioned the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9084 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. See State v. Badker, 2001 WI App 27, ¶8, 240 Wis. 2d 460, 623 N.W.2d 142 (“[W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83136 - 2014-09-15
we review de novo. See State v. Badker, 2001 WI App 27, ¶8, 240 Wis. 2d 460, 623 N.W.2d 142 (“[W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83136 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This appeal follows. ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
. This appeal follows. ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
[PDF]
Thomas M.P. v. Kimberly J.L.
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W.2d 865, 866 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10512 - 2017-09-20
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W.2d 865, 866 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10512 - 2017-09-20
State v. Johnnie Phiffer
, and we review the postconviction court’s decision de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis.2d 379
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
, and we review the postconviction court’s decision de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis.2d 379
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
Platt Barber v. Ken Weber
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24599 - 2006-05-30
We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24599 - 2006-05-30