Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 20860 for word.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 20860 for word.
[PDF]
Jeffrey A. Wagner v. Milwaukee County Election Commission
, this court typically examines three sources: "the plain meaning of the words in the context used
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16590 - 2017-09-21
, this court typically examines three sources: "the plain meaning of the words in the context used
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16590 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey A. Wagner v. Milwaukee County Election Commission
three sources: "the plain meaning of the words in the context used; the constitutional debates
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16590 - 2005-03-31
three sources: "the plain meaning of the words in the context used; the constitutional debates
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gary G. Pfister v. Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation
(underlined words added by amendment). Section 109.09(2), STATS., as amended, provides: No. 96-0314
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10328 - 2017-09-20
(underlined words added by amendment). Section 109.09(2), STATS., as amended, provides: No. 96-0314
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10328 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James E. Gray
. The word “plan” in sec. 904.04(2) means a design or scheme formed to accomplish some particular purpose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17185 - 2017-09-21
. The word “plan” in sec. 904.04(2) means a design or scheme formed to accomplish some particular purpose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17185 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI 30
with the language of the statute. If the meaning of the words of a statute is plain, we ordinarily stop our inquiry
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28433 - 2007-03-12
with the language of the statute. If the meaning of the words of a statute is plain, we ordinarily stop our inquiry
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28433 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
WI App 6
(quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976)). However, the use of specific words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205947 - 2018-02-12
(quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976)). However, the use of specific words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205947 - 2018-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Stephen Toliver
carrying. Stephen then spoke, stating words that remained in dispute at trial: either “kill that bitch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3011 - 2017-09-19
carrying. Stephen then spoke, stating words that remained in dispute at trial: either “kill that bitch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 30
. If the meaning of the words of a statute is plain, we ordinarily stop our inquiry and apply the words chosen
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28433 - 2014-09-15
. If the meaning of the words of a statute is plain, we ordinarily stop our inquiry and apply the words chosen
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28433 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
services is not exclusive—in the words of § 814.29(1)(d)2., it lists examples “without limitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996972 - 2025-08-14
services is not exclusive—in the words of § 814.29(1)(d)2., it lists examples “without limitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996972 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
WI 64
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage." Id., ¶46; see also Johnson v. State, 76
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84090 - 2014-09-15
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage." Id., ¶46; see also Johnson v. State, 76
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84090 - 2014-09-15