Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53261 - 53270 of 64190 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, the response, and independently reviewed the appellate record, expressly analyzing Jarmon’s fluctuating mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26787 - 2006-10-16

State v. Kim D. Tesky
occasions during that same period, which convictions remain of record and unreversed. It is immaterial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lorino's Car Wash West, Inc. v. Becker Trust No. 1
independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., to the record de novo. See Garcia v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12683 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
as summary judgment, the record demonstrates the court considered evidence outside the pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32807 - 2008-05-27

[PDF] Sharon L. Pretsch v. Kenneth A. Pretsch
by the state circuit court would not violate the automatic stay. The record indicates that the minutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9000 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John Robert John
the circuit court logically interpreted the facts of record and whether it applied the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3315 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jesus Barbary v. James R. Sturm
findings must be upheld on review if there is credible and substantial evidence in the record upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10989 - 2017-09-19

John J. Surinak v. John Kaishian
to Kaishian. Although referring to tax-stamp records in connection with the transactions transferring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12064 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by issue preclusion and claim preclusion. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348659 - 2021-03-25

Lynda D. Dahlke v. James D. Dahlke
was expecting. The court acknowledged that there was no evidence in the record from which the bonus could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15575 - 2005-03-31