Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53271 - 53280 of 82382 for simple case.
Search results 53271 - 53280 of 82382 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 767.451, effective January 1, 2007. The date of the final order in the present case is January 17, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33445 - 2008-07-21
. § 767.451, effective January 1, 2007. The date of the final order in the present case is January 17, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33445 - 2008-07-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095098 - 2026-03-24
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095098 - 2026-03-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
No. 2024AP1352 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992351 - 2025-08-06
No. 2024AP1352 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992351 - 2025-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
as a controlled substance under Schedule II. Wis. Stat. § 961.16(5). Thus, to prove its case, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65432 - 2011-06-08
as a controlled substance under Schedule II. Wis. Stat. § 961.16(5). Thus, to prove its case, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65432 - 2011-06-08
Community Development Authority of the City of Glendale v. Hancock Fabrics, Inc.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has defined mootness, as relevant to this case, as follows: A moot case … [is] one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18716 - 2005-06-27
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has defined mootness, as relevant to this case, as follows: A moot case … [is] one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18716 - 2005-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was inapplicable in this case. Because we agree with the court that the arresting officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441190 - 2021-10-13
was inapplicable in this case. Because we agree with the court that the arresting officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441190 - 2021-10-13
[PDF]
State v. Rucker Detective Agency
this case as far as coming within the statute. Although the trial court made no explicit finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12924 - 2017-09-21
this case as far as coming within the statute. Although the trial court made no explicit finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12924 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nova Services, Inc. v. Village of Saukville
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2198 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11193 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2198 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11193 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
submission of his case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.20 (2011-12). His case was assigned on May 22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97900 - 2014-09-15
submission of his case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.20 (2011-12). His case was assigned on May 22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97900 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2018AP18-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case involves the sexual assault and trafficking of a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225656 - 2018-11-07
). No. 2018AP18-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case involves the sexual assault and trafficking of a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225656 - 2018-11-07