Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53281 - 53290 of 57719 for id.
Search results 53281 - 53290 of 57719 for id.
State v. Mary K.
in order to assure the safety of the children.” Id., ¶18. In the present case, the trial court expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18073 - 2005-05-19
in order to assure the safety of the children.” Id., ¶18. In the present case, the trial court expressly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18073 - 2005-05-19
Robert Machotka v. Village of West Salem
]’s representation of the district, and was, in effect, the culmination of that representation.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15468 - 2005-03-31
]’s representation of the district, and was, in effect, the culmination of that representation.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15468 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of greatest importance and explain how a particular sentence advances those objectives. Id. The necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
of greatest importance and explain how a particular sentence advances those objectives. Id. The necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasonable doubt.” Id. “Thus, an appellate court must ‘search the record to support the conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40041 - 2009-09-01
a reasonable doubt.” Id. “Thus, an appellate court must ‘search the record to support the conclusion reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40041 - 2009-09-01
CA Blank Order
is right and proper under the circumstances.” See id. There would be no merit to challenging the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
is right and proper under the circumstances.” See id. There would be no merit to challenging the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
of the public interest. Id. The referee stated that her recommendation to deny Harman's petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17562 - 2005-03-31
of the public interest. Id. The referee stated that her recommendation to deny Harman's petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17562 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
have made its decision. See id. (citation omitted). Discussion ¶5 Winters argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14
have made its decision. See id. (citation omitted). Discussion ¶5 Winters argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
standard. Id. at 310-11, 548 N.W.2d at 53 (citations omitted). The three factors referenced in Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14056 - 2014-09-15
standard. Id. at 310-11, 548 N.W.2d at 53 (citations omitted). The three factors referenced in Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14056 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James O. Buros v. Dairy Farmers of America
of credible evidence to support the claim. Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). Claim for Tortious Interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7462 - 2017-09-20
of credible evidence to support the claim. Id., ¶17 (citation omitted). Claim for Tortious Interference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7462 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
change of heart … other than the desire to have a trial.” Id. at 861-62 (citation omitted). Even where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72852 - 2011-10-24
change of heart … other than the desire to have a trial.” Id. at 861-62 (citation omitted). Even where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72852 - 2011-10-24