Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53291 - 53300 of 57708 for id.
Search results 53291 - 53300 of 57708 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
with the underlying factual findings. Id., ¶41. ¶14 Michael’s vocational expert testified that Kathy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27430 - 2006-12-13
with the underlying factual findings. Id., ¶41. ¶14 Michael’s vocational expert testified that Kathy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27430 - 2006-12-13
Robert Machotka v. Village of West Salem
]’s representation of the district, and was, in effect, the culmination of that representation.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15468 - 2005-03-31
]’s representation of the district, and was, in effect, the culmination of that representation.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15468 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
in relation to consecutive sentences[6] is allowed only on one consecutive sentence. Id., ¶¶19-20. Credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139003 - 2015-04-07
in relation to consecutive sentences[6] is allowed only on one consecutive sentence. Id., ¶¶19-20. Credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139003 - 2015-04-07
CA Blank Order
of greatest importance and explain how a particular sentence advances those objectives. Id. The necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
of greatest importance and explain how a particular sentence advances those objectives. Id. The necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
State v. Kirby J. Krueger
whether each offense requires proof of an additional fact which the others do not. Id. at 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13919 - 2005-03-31
whether each offense requires proof of an additional fact which the others do not. Id. at 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13919 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Angela M. McEvoy v. Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire
or reckless disregard of the lack of a reasonable basis for denying the claim." Id. at 691, 271 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10616 - 2017-09-20
or reckless disregard of the lack of a reasonable basis for denying the claim." Id. at 691, 271 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10616 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.’” Id. at 18-19 (citation omitted, brackets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109495 - 2017-09-21
abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.’” Id. at 18-19 (citation omitted, brackets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109495 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
if it is clearly erroneous. Id., ¶45. Here, the court’s competency determination was based on the examiner’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514062 - 2022-04-26
if it is clearly erroneous. Id., ¶45. Here, the court’s competency determination was based on the examiner’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514062 - 2022-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, intelligently and voluntarily entered. Id. The highly “deferential, clearly erroneous” standard also applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317120 - 2020-12-22
, intelligently and voluntarily entered. Id. The highly “deferential, clearly erroneous” standard also applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317120 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence R. Peterson
by another was the natural and probable consequence of the defendant’s conduct is a jury question. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16277 - 2017-09-21
by another was the natural and probable consequence of the defendant’s conduct is a jury question. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16277 - 2017-09-21