Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5331 - 5340 of 98499 for court records search online.
Search results 5331 - 5340 of 98499 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of fact, this court searches the record for evidence to support findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499082 - 2022-03-24
the circuit court’s findings of fact, this court searches the record for evidence to support findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499082 - 2022-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
… unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record.” Sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910382 - 2025-02-04
… unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record.” Sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910382 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
? [TRIAL COUNSEL]: No, Judge. …. THE COURT: And I want to put on the record, the court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188270 - 2017-09-21
? [TRIAL COUNSEL]: No, Judge. …. THE COURT: And I want to put on the record, the court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1). ¶9 On appeal, we search the record for facts to uphold the jury’s verdict. Marquez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=411505 - 2021-08-17
(1). ¶9 On appeal, we search the record for facts to uphold the jury’s verdict. Marquez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=411505 - 2021-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. Id. ¶9 The record here fully supports the circuit court’s decision to use visible restraints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
discretion. Id. ¶9 The record here fully supports the circuit court’s decision to use visible restraints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts in the record, no reasonable court could have concluded that termination of parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289479 - 2020-09-22
the facts in the record, no reasonable court could have concluded that termination of parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289479 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings on the third factor are not supported by the record. This factor requires the court to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862046 - 2024-10-15
findings on the third factor are not supported by the record. This factor requires the court to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862046 - 2024-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the offense and Richardson’s prior record. Richardson complains that the circuit court offered no rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65050 - 2011-05-31
of the offense and Richardson’s prior record. Richardson complains that the circuit court offered no rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65050 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, and “[w]e search the record for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118993 - 2014-08-06
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, and “[w]e search the record for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118993 - 2014-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
miscarried. See Wis. Stat. § 752.35 (“In an appeal to the court of appeals, if it appears from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85106 - 2012-07-16
miscarried. See Wis. Stat. § 752.35 (“In an appeal to the court of appeals, if it appears from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85106 - 2012-07-16