Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5331 - 5340 of 12871 for se.
Search results 5331 - 5340 of 12871 for se.
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“Hennings I”). Hennings then moved pro se for postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28985 - 2007-06-26
) (“Hennings I”). Hennings then moved pro se for postconviction relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28985 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Anthony Ellis, pro se, appeals from orders denying his third WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2009-10)1 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92348 - 2014-09-15
. Anthony Ellis, pro se, appeals from orders denying his third WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2009-10)1 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92348 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Gaustad unequivocally indicated his preference to proceed pro se, and the court ensured that Gaustad
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241928 - 2019-06-07
. Gaustad unequivocally indicated his preference to proceed pro se, and the court ensured that Gaustad
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241928 - 2019-06-07
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Verdone
requested by an officer in the lawful performance of an act constitutes a per se violation of sec. 946.41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8779 - 2017-09-19
requested by an officer in the lawful performance of an act constitutes a per se violation of sec. 946.41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8779 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Jermel Antonio Robinson, pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315643 - 2020-12-22
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Jermel Antonio Robinson, pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315643 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing Griffin’s “petition for recission [sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73969 - 2014-09-15
, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing Griffin’s “petition for recission [sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73969 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Kettner, pro se, appeals a judgment, entered upon his no-contest pleas, convicting him of operating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191460 - 2017-09-21
Kettner, pro se, appeals a judgment, entered upon his no-contest pleas, convicting him of operating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191460 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Craig L. Miller
Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Craig Miller, pro se, appeals orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3345 - 2017-09-19
Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Craig Miller, pro se, appeals orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3345 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the previously mentioned request to pro se representation that he made in front of Judge Ptacek.” Thus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236559 - 2019-03-06
of the previously mentioned request to pro se representation that he made in front of Judge Ptacek.” Thus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236559 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Benjamin M. Withrow appeals pro se from a judgment convicting him of aggravated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489373 - 2022-03-02
. RULE 809.23(3). Benjamin M. Withrow appeals pro se from a judgment convicting him of aggravated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489373 - 2022-03-02

