Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53301 - 53310 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 53301 - 53310 of 74898 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
memoranda and the record, we affirm the circuit court. ¶2 The facts of this matter are set out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49540 - 2010-05-19
memoranda and the record, we affirm the circuit court. ¶2 The facts of this matter are set out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49540 - 2010-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
resolve those claims without an evidentiary hearing, relying on the existing record supplemented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49474 - 2014-09-15
resolve those claims without an evidentiary hearing, relying on the existing record supplemented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49474 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not in evidence. Based upon a review of the briefs and record, we No. 2023AP823-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
not in evidence. Based upon a review of the briefs and record, we No. 2023AP823-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not in evidence. Based upon a review of the briefs and record, we No. 2023AP823-CR 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
not in evidence. Based upon a review of the briefs and record, we No. 2023AP823-CR 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, was not made part of the appellate Record, and this court therefore will not consider it. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968545 - 2025-06-11
, however, was not made part of the appellate Record, and this court therefore will not consider it. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968545 - 2025-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
months in jail as a sanction for his contempt with purge conditions. The record suggests that Jay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374306 - 2021-06-08
months in jail as a sanction for his contempt with purge conditions. The record suggests that Jay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374306 - 2021-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because “the record” of her guilty plea fails to demonstrate she was “aware of the essential elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191510 - 2017-09-21
because “the record” of her guilty plea fails to demonstrate she was “aware of the essential elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191510 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
policy because Tyler has failed to include the policy in the appellate record.[7] Instead, he cites his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50145 - 2010-05-17
policy because Tyler has failed to include the policy in the appellate record.[7] Instead, he cites his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50145 - 2010-05-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel requested to “put something on the record outside the presence of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242941 - 2019-06-27
trial counsel requested to “put something on the record outside the presence of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242941 - 2019-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Everton Taylor
probable cause existed for issuance of a search warrant, “we are confined to the record that was before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19
probable cause existed for issuance of a search warrant, “we are confined to the record that was before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19