Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53331 - 53340 of 98601 for court records search online.
Search results 53331 - 53340 of 98601 for court records search online.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. § 806.07. We do not review the court’s grant of summary judgment. Here, we conclude the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
. § 806.07. We do not review the court’s grant of summary judgment. Here, we conclude the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. § 806.07. We do not review the court’s grant of summary judgment. Here, we conclude the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
. § 806.07. We do not review the court’s grant of summary judgment. Here, we conclude the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
[PDF]
State v. Danny R. Mays
successful.” The record reveals that the trial court appropriately considered the aggravated nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10124 - 2017-09-19
successful.” The record reveals that the trial court appropriately considered the aggravated nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10124 - 2017-09-19
State v. Danny R. Mays
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED December 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10124 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED December 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10124 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
based upon its review of the records of its own proceedings. The trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10272 - 2005-03-31
based upon its review of the records of its own proceedings. The trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED AUGUST 13, 1996 NOTICE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10271 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED AUGUST 13, 1996 NOTICE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10271 - 2017-09-20
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
based upon its review of the records of its own proceedings. The trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10271 - 2005-03-31
based upon its review of the records of its own proceedings. The trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10271 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charlie Sislo
the circuit court considered the facts of record, and reasoned its way to a rational, legally sound conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18850 - 2005-07-05
the circuit court considered the facts of record, and reasoned its way to a rational, legally sound conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18850 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the record for not doing so at the original sentencing. In fact, the court did not address the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30637 - 2014-09-15
on the record for not doing so at the original sentencing. In fact, the court did not address the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30637 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charlie Sislo
court’s discretionary act only to determine whether the circuit court considered the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18850 - 2017-09-21
court’s discretionary act only to determine whether the circuit court considered the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18850 - 2017-09-21