Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53351 - 53360 of 56199 for n y c.

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 21-04 - Comments from Christina J. Gilbert, Senior Youth Policy Counsel, The Gault Center, National Juvenile Defender Center
-content/uploads/2014/09/Kraus-Affidavit- General-Final.pdf; Rost Aff. ¶ (7) (c-d), https://njdc.info/wp
/supreme/docs/2104commentsgilbert.pdf - 2021-12-23

[PDF] Disposition table for September & October, 2004
Shannon S. v. Jackson C. 09/16/04 Prosser and Butler, J.J., dissent. 03-3043 State v. Geiger 10/19
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=864 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - February 2020
; and (c) to allow defense counsel to examine the expert witness about how long transferred DNA might
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253630 - 2020-02-04

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court calendar and case synopses
in Waukesha) that affirmed the Winnebago County Circuit Court order, Judge Scott C. Woldt presiding
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac0324.pdf - 2024-03-01

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 13, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cou...
sentenced him I realized he was not a drug dealer. C. Whether Rivas was addicted to cocaine and marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70793 - 2011-09-12

State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
is a question of law that we review independently. County of Kenosha v. C & S Mgmt., Inc., 223 Wis. 2d 373, 395
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5230 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had changed.” ¶17 As to the final factor, prejudice, “[c]ourts consider [this element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380667 - 2021-06-23

[PDF] Cindy Brenengen v. Brian D. Brenengen
was clearly erroneous. See Estate of Dejmal, 95 Wis.2d at 151-52, 289 N.W.2d at 818. C. Tax Consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14064 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground[.]”). ¶13 Summary judgment shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677088 - 2023-07-11

[PDF] State v. Jose S. Soto
Carmona’s testimony. No. 03-2234-CR 10 C. Witnesses’ Addresses. ¶25 Soto’s next claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6784 - 2017-09-20