Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5341 - 5350 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5341 - 5350 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
CA Blank Order
with the victim and the chain of custody of DNA evidence. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requires
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98002 - 2013-06-06
with the victim and the chain of custody of DNA evidence. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requires
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98002 - 2013-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
battery (intending great bodily harm) and from circuit court orders denying his motion to reconsider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489373 - 2022-03-02
battery (intending great bodily harm) and from circuit court orders denying his motion to reconsider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489373 - 2022-03-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and the chain of custody of DNA evidence. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requires a showing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98002 - 2014-09-15
and the chain of custody of DNA evidence. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requires a showing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98002 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jeffrey A. Wagner v. Milwaukee County Election Commission
to this matter to submit a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which they did on April 11, 2002. Other important
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16590 - 2017-09-21
to this matter to submit a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which they did on April 11, 2002. Other important
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16590 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey A. Wagner v. Milwaukee County Election Commission
, this court ordered the parties to this matter to submit a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which they did on April
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16590 - 2005-03-31
, this court ordered the parties to this matter to submit a Joint Stipulation of Facts, which they did on April
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16590 - 2005-03-31
WI 53 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Notice This order is subject to further editing and...
support, custody or placement provision of an action in which the state is a real party in interest
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67197 - 2011-06-30
support, custody or placement provision of an action in which the state is a real party in interest
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67197 - 2011-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order of the circuit court denying his motion to rescind or modify restitution. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75605 - 2011-12-27
from an order of the circuit court denying his motion to rescind or modify restitution. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75605 - 2011-12-27
[PDF]
State v. Troy J. Olmsted
, as a party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. 1 He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7108 - 2017-09-20
, as a party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. 1 He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7108 - 2017-09-20
State v. Troy J. Olmsted
postconviction motion.[1] He argues that his no contest plea was involuntary and unknowing because it was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] He argues that his no contest plea was involuntary and unknowing because it was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of fifteen months in jail because of the dangerous weapon enhancer. A motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175696 - 2017-09-21
of fifteen months in jail because of the dangerous weapon enhancer. A motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175696 - 2017-09-21