Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5341 - 5350 of 29942 for des.
Search results 5341 - 5350 of 29942 for des.
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31
Ronnie Prophet v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, Inc.
We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15296 - 2005-03-31
We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15296 - 2005-03-31
Jerry M. v. Dennis L. M.
agree with Dennis that the standard of review governing this issue is de novo. While a court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8490 - 2005-03-31
agree with Dennis that the standard of review governing this issue is de novo. While a court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8490 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the witnesses. B. The trial court’s unavailability finding. ¶19 Reviewing de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
the witnesses. B. The trial court’s unavailability finding. ¶19 Reviewing de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
2008 WI APP 86
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶33, 302 Wis. 2d 428
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32691 - 2008-06-24
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶33, 302 Wis. 2d 428
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32691 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2004 WI 113, ¶12, 275 Wis. 2d 35, 683 N.W.2d 75. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102715 - 2026-04-15
, 2004 WI 113, ¶12, 275 Wis. 2d 35, 683 N.W.2d 75. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102715 - 2026-04-15
[PDF]
State v. George C. Lohmeier
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See Bachowski v. Salamone, 139 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8028 - 2017-09-19
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See Bachowski v. Salamone, 139 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8028 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Khounmy Lanoi
of constitutional principles to undisputed facts which we review de novo. See State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 530
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12278 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional principles to undisputed facts which we review de novo. See State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 530
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Dodge County: MARTIN J. DE VRIES, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2025AP483 2 ¶1 KLOPPENBURG, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027815 - 2025-10-23
for Dodge County: MARTIN J. DE VRIES, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2025AP483 2 ¶1 KLOPPENBURG, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027815 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Mikulance
of his claim. ¶8 The construction and application of a statute are questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
of his claim. ¶8 The construction and application of a statute are questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21