Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5341 - 5350 of 61717 for does.

[PDF] State v. Gwendolyn McGee
. The trial court held that the motion was premature because application of the disobedience defense does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17617 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 171
the existing test the church custodian’s residence does not qualify for the tax exemption of § 70.11(4). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41828 - 2009-11-23

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
lease incorporates the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 704.05(3), does the lease violate Wis. Stat
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047416 - 2025-12-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the property does not exceed $1,000, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. (b) If the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783608 - 2024-04-03

2007 WI APP 253
for sanctions does not comply with the safe-harbor provision, and that a warning, as opposed to a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31021 - 2007-12-18

[PDF] State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation v. Keith J. Peterson
on the attorney general does not constitute service on a body to which the Legislature has given powers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13032 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Deonte D. Riley
to the State, law enforcement did not “intercept” Riley’s communications and the WESCL does not apply. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19225 - 2017-09-21

Tricia Janssen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
applies to payments made by and on behalf of tortfeasors, and does not apply to payments made by other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3962 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the driveway ordinance. However, he does not contend that the hearing examiner’s finding that he started
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32846 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 171
custodian’s residence does not qualify for the tax exemption of § 70.11(4). We agree with the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41828 - 2014-09-15