Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5341 - 5350 of 68967 for had.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the child remained in need of protection or services under WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2) and that T.C.G. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in finding that there had been a substantial change of circumstances since the entry of the last placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242477 - 2019-06-20

[PDF] NOTICE
of the night shifts were making “dry ice bombs.”2 The employee said she had seen a co-worker barely outrun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30071 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) the State should pay for more DNA testing because it may show another man had sex with the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82114 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Lilly
. When police were unable to draw information using the name Lilly had given, he was asked if he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9493 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The trooper, along with back-ups, later had contact with Olivia inside of a Kwik Trip while Mutters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714757 - 2023-10-18

[PDF] State v. William Oscar Marquis
argues that the trial court erred when it found that the police had probable cause to seize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10103 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
while he was trying to “rebut the State’s allegation that [Olu A. Rhodes] had a motive to harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06

Jodi Hurlburt v. OHIC Insurance Company
, and because the statute of limitations had expired. The Hurlburts argue that dismissal was erroneous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5101 - 2005-03-31

Lindsay Mosher v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
that Dvorak would testify for the defense. However, after the Moshers had closed their case-in-chief, defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15114 - 2005-03-31