Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53401 - 53410 of 57719 for id.
Search results 53401 - 53410 of 57719 for id.
State v. Kawanee P.
the pertinent facts, applied the correct law, and reached a reasonable conclusion. Id. Here, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6044 - 2005-03-31
the pertinent facts, applied the correct law, and reached a reasonable conclusion. Id. Here, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6044 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael S. R.
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 507. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE ¶8 Here, Michael does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20578 - 2005-12-13
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 507. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE ¶8 Here, Michael does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20578 - 2005-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
to abandon it.’” Id. at 18-19 (citation omitted, brackets in original). We look at the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109495 - 2014-03-24
to abandon it.’” Id. at 18-19 (citation omitted, brackets in original). We look at the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109495 - 2014-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
a criminal trial in a court of record. See id. at 288 (Goldberg, J., concurring). Kleppek’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32482 - 2008-04-21
a criminal trial in a court of record. See id. at 288 (Goldberg, J., concurring). Kleppek’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32482 - 2008-04-21
[PDF]
State v. John Edward Kraemer
exercised that discretion. Id. ¶11 Here, the circuit court concluded that, while the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18188 - 2017-09-21
exercised that discretion. Id. ¶11 Here, the circuit court concluded that, while the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18188 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). There is a presumption that a sentence “well within the limits of the maximum sentence” is not unduly harsh. Id., ¶¶31
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595333 - 2022-11-29
). There is a presumption that a sentence “well within the limits of the maximum sentence” is not unduly harsh. Id., ¶¶31
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595333 - 2022-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s decision.” Id., ¶30 (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987464 - 2025-07-24
was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s decision.” Id., ¶30 (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987464 - 2025-07-24
State v. John Edward Kraemer
that the circuit court erroneously exercised that discretion. Id. ¶11 Here, the circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
that the circuit court erroneously exercised that discretion. Id. ¶11 Here, the circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
County of Sheboygan v. Rodney G.R.
in favor of the order for commitment. Id. As we explain below, the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4953 - 2005-03-31
in favor of the order for commitment. Id. As we explain below, the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4953 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 97
, Bettendorf’s permit necessarily was invalid once the ordinance was voided. Id., ¶16. Accordingly, we reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32759 - 2008-06-24
, Bettendorf’s permit necessarily was invalid once the ordinance was voided. Id., ¶16. Accordingly, we reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32759 - 2008-06-24