Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53431 - 53440 of 61694 for judgment.
Search results 53431 - 53440 of 61694 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Therefore, the court refused to file an amended judgment of conviction. ¶4 The court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50567 - 2010-06-01
. Therefore, the court refused to file an amended judgment of conviction. ¶4 The court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50567 - 2010-06-01
Sukhbinder Singh v. Metro Area Properties, Inc.
that a judgment was entered for the statutorily permitted costs. ¶8 Third, Singh argues there is merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4958 - 2005-03-31
that a judgment was entered for the statutorily permitted costs. ¶8 Third, Singh argues there is merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32, concluding there is no basis for appealing a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104491 - 2017-09-21
a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32, concluding there is no basis for appealing a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Stahl
. No. 2005AP2328-CR 4 judgment of conviction directs be reimbursed to the Justice Sanctions program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP2328-CR 4 judgment of conviction directs be reimbursed to the Justice Sanctions program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be made to respond to the court’s judgment.”).
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676489 - 2023-07-06
be made to respond to the court’s judgment.”).
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676489 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
WI APP 273
, appeals as of right may be taken only from final judgments and orders, while appeals from interlocutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31006 - 2014-09-15
, appeals as of right may be taken only from final judgments and orders, while appeals from interlocutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31006 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Urban A. Hubert, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
was “arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment”; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12157 - 2017-09-21
was “arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment”; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12157 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randy J. Stahl
restitution hearings, the only restitution order in the record is for $965, which the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30
restitution hearings, the only restitution order in the record is for $965, which the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30
[PDF]
State v. Reuben G. May
for his anticipated post-judgment motion. His non-specific request certainly does not show the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5828 - 2017-09-19
for his anticipated post-judgment motion. His non-specific request certainly does not show the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5828 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
13, 2010, a judgment of divorce was granted and the matter was set for an oral decision on December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96352 - 2013-05-06
13, 2010, a judgment of divorce was granted and the matter was set for an oral decision on December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96352 - 2013-05-06