Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53441 - 53450 of 82591 for simple case.

Casanova Retail Liquor Store, Inc. v. State
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9079 - 2005-03-31

State v. Clarissa P.
to the fact finder to satisfy the obstruction element of the offense. This case states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15033 - 2005-03-31

State v. Booker T. Shipp
was prejudicial to defendant’s case, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment[s] to the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12868 - 2005-03-31

City of Clintonville v. Michael J. Kuhn
“observations made by the officer in this case are far more favorable to this defendant than were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 6
2009 WI App 6 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2541 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34749 - 2009-01-27

Gregory W. Schaefer v. Barbara Conway
] Whether a fiduciary duty exists involves the application of law to the facts of the case and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2012-12-13

State v. Thomas C. Grohmann
. [COUNSEL]: I can't recall. On misdemeanor cases, Judge, in speaking with the district attorneys, I can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9143 - 2005-03-31

State v. Raymond F. Gose
is material to an issue in the case; (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative to the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6989 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
) whether the evidence is material to a fact at issue in the case; and (3) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09

COURT OF APPEALS
in this case by assuming the truth of disputed facts. Here, the court relied on the revocation summary, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13