Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53471 - 53480 of 61694 for judgment.
Search results 53471 - 53480 of 61694 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction in a no-merit appeal. See State v. Lambert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31847 - 2008-02-19
supervision. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction in a no-merit appeal. See State v. Lambert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31847 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the couple’s two minor children. ¶3 On April 9, 2009, Daryl moved to revise the divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72184 - 2014-09-15
of the couple’s two minor children. ¶3 On April 9, 2009, Daryl moved to revise the divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72184 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment of conviction, ruling that there were no meritorious issues for appeal. No. 2006AP509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27034 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction, ruling that there were no meritorious issues for appeal. No. 2006AP509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27034 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
within 20 days of the effective date of the order or judgment of the other jurisdiction constitutes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627153 - 2023-04-17
within 20 days of the effective date of the order or judgment of the other jurisdiction constitutes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627153 - 2023-04-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the information. After judgment was entered, Johnson’s counsel filed a no-merit report, identifying three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28708 - 2014-09-15
in the information. After judgment was entered, Johnson’s counsel filed a no-merit report, identifying three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28708 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
issues of arguable merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments are summarily affirmed. See Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140093 - 2015-04-20
issues of arguable merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments are summarily affirmed. See Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140093 - 2015-04-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218047 - 2018-08-21
no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218047 - 2018-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
initial confinement portion of the sentence. Therefore, the court refused to file an amended judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50567 - 2014-09-15
initial confinement portion of the sentence. Therefore, the court refused to file an amended judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50567 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501422 - 2022-03-31
potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501422 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
Baron L. Walker, Sr. v. Daniel Bertrand
will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that the committee might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13550 - 2017-09-21
will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that the committee might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13550 - 2017-09-21