Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53481 - 53490 of 61694 for judgment.
Search results 53481 - 53490 of 61694 for judgment.
[PDF]
State v. Henry James Brookshire
not consider any 1 Brookshire appealed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18306 - 2017-09-21
not consider any 1 Brookshire appealed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18306 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
this is not a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. See State v. Allen, 159 Wis. 2d 53, 55- 56, 464 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24497 - 2017-09-21
this is not a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. See State v. Allen, 159 Wis. 2d 53, 55- 56, 464 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24497 - 2017-09-21
Lamonte Simmons v. Jeffrey Endicott
and represented its will and not its judgment, and whether the evidence was such that the committee might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31
and represented its will and not its judgment, and whether the evidence was such that the committee might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
have prevented the entry of judgment.” See State ex rel. Patel v. State, 2012 WI App 117, ¶13, 344
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526681 - 2022-06-01
have prevented the entry of judgment.” See State ex rel. Patel v. State, 2012 WI App 117, ¶13, 344
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526681 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
Dennis Brooks v. Diane Hietpas
has no power to substitute its judgment for that of the legislature as to the essentials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21302 - 2017-09-21
has no power to substitute its judgment for that of the legislature as to the essentials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21302 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on revocation of his probation. We affirmed the postrevocation judgment in November 2005, on Gaustad’s no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31795 - 2008-02-13
on revocation of his probation. We affirmed the postrevocation judgment in November 2005, on Gaustad’s no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31795 - 2008-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERD that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140294 - 2017-09-21
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERD that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140294 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
the judgments and orders, concluding that there was no arguable basis for appeal. In 2012, Hill filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98555 - 2013-06-23
the judgments and orders, concluding that there was no arguable basis for appeal. In 2012, Hill filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98555 - 2013-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Kelly Duke, pro se, appeals orders denying his collateral attack on the judgment convicting him of two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261017 - 2020-05-19
). Kelly Duke, pro se, appeals orders denying his collateral attack on the judgment convicting him of two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261017 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for fees and costs based upon the record before it. There was no judgment establishing a violation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131923 - 2017-09-21
for fees and costs based upon the record before it. There was no judgment establishing a violation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131923 - 2017-09-21