Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5351 - 5360 of 68202 for law.

COURT OF APPEALS
number. He testified at the hearing before the administrative law judge that he did not file the January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28

[PDF] State v. Kathleen A. Krogman
to do so. Krogman refused. Otterbacher clarified that law enforcement officers are allowed to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13295 - 2017-09-21

Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Kellberg
, Weissenberger sought a listing of the department's employees and law enforcement officers. No further action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13968 - 2005-03-31

County of Jefferson v. James A. Lenz
for refusing to take it. Lenz and his brother-in-law (a passenger in the van) claimed that Drayna had told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31

Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
the issue is one of procedure, interpretation of law, or finding of fact. Id. Whether an issue is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4989 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ryon S. R. v. David Schwarz
inconsistencies in Rebecca’s various accounts of the abuse. The administrative law judge found Rebecca’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24920 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, Geboy stated that Adamek was the girlfriend of a co-worker and Loporchio’s brother-in-law, Mike Hotz. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34281 - 2008-10-14

[PDF] James Munroe v. Kenneth Morgan
that the defendants violated several state laws and his constitutional right to due process in their issuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11027 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Thomas E. Zablocki
TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas E. Zablocki, Attorney at Law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16365 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
asserts, his judgment of conviction for OWI first offense in this case is void as a matter of law. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36120 - 2009-04-08