Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5351 - 5360 of 56192 for n y c.
Search results 5351 - 5360 of 56192 for n y c.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inconsistent statement, the “declarant” must “testif[y] at trial … and [be] subject to cross- examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380418 - 2021-06-29
inconsistent statement, the “declarant” must “testif[y] at trial … and [be] subject to cross- examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380418 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3569 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3569 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
visible antennae, light bars, and a flood lamp. ¶6 Mahoney did a Y-turn and followed the motorcycle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203612 - 2017-11-28
visible antennae, light bars, and a flood lamp. ¶6 Mahoney did a Y-turn and followed the motorcycle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203612 - 2017-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
, 548 N.W.2d 817 (1996). Prokop’s testimony at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
, 548 N.W.2d 817 (1996). Prokop’s testimony at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
WI App 136 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2952-CR Complete Ti...
court instructed the jury to consider each charge separately, stating “[y]our verdict for the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89255 - 2012-12-18
court instructed the jury to consider each charge separately, stating “[y]our verdict for the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89255 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3571 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3571 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3570 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3568 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3568 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
proceedings, “the right to be present is an essential element of due process” and must “appl[y] equally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113166 - 2014-05-27
proceedings, “the right to be present is an essential element of due process” and must “appl[y] equally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113166 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the PSI report. The circuit court said: “[B]y the way, as I go past here, the Static- 99R indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398591 - 2021-07-28
at the PSI report. The circuit court said: “[B]y the way, as I go past here, the Static- 99R indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398591 - 2021-07-28