Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5351 - 5360 of 74480 for public records.
Search results 5351 - 5360 of 74480 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 The record before this court on appeal is incomplete. Among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184646 - 2017-09-21
below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 The record before this court on appeal is incomplete. Among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184646 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derek E.
him. Derek claims the court erred in finding that it would be in the best interest of both the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13319 - 2005-03-31
him. Derek claims the court erred in finding that it would be in the best interest of both the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13319 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because under the facts alleged in the amended complaint, a private nuisance claim is barred on public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143087 - 2017-09-21
because under the facts alleged in the amended complaint, a private nuisance claim is barred on public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143087 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged in the amended complaint, a private nuisance claim is barred on public policy grounds.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143087 - 2015-06-16
alleged in the amended complaint, a private nuisance claim is barred on public policy grounds.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143087 - 2015-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
payments.[2] He argues: (1) the court improperly allowed the state public defender to represent Karmen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136565 - 2015-03-04
payments.[2] He argues: (1) the court improperly allowed the state public defender to represent Karmen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136565 - 2015-03-04
State v. Derek E.
him. Derek claims the court erred in finding that it would be in the best interest of both the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13282 - 2005-03-31
him. Derek claims the court erred in finding that it would be in the best interest of both the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13282 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
improperly allowed the state public defender to represent Karmen at the October 30, 2013 de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136565 - 2017-09-21
improperly allowed the state public defender to represent Karmen at the October 30, 2013 de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136565 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2014-01-07
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2014-01-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90589 - 2014-09-15
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90589 - 2014-09-15
State v. John L. Kuslits
for community based treatment; (5) he had no criminal record; (6) he did not force himself on his victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6859 - 2005-03-31
for community based treatment; (5) he had no criminal record; (6) he did not force himself on his victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6859 - 2005-03-31