Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53511 - 53520 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 53511 - 53520 of 83958 for simple case search.
Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
for further proceedings. Background ¶2 This case involves a family dispute over lakefront property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31
for further proceedings. Background ¶2 This case involves a family dispute over lakefront property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth W. Pickens
. On the day of a scheduled motion hearing in the case, Pickens' first trial counsel visited him at the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11033 - 2005-03-31
. On the day of a scheduled motion hearing in the case, Pickens' first trial counsel visited him at the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11033 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Adam Procell
a conviction is the same in either a direct or circumstantial evidence case. See State v. Poellinger, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11980 - 2017-09-21
a conviction is the same in either a direct or circumstantial evidence case. See State v. Poellinger, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11980 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
has made a prima facie case on this basis, the second step of the analysis shifts the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69079 - 2014-09-15
has made a prima facie case on this basis, the second step of the analysis shifts the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289305 - 2020-09-22
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289305 - 2020-09-22
State v. Adam Procell
or circumstantial evidence case. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis.2d 493, 501, 451 N.W.2d 752, 755 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11980 - 2005-03-31
or circumstantial evidence case. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis.2d 493, 501, 451 N.W.2d 752, 755 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11980 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J. This is a governmental contractor immunity case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137010 - 2015-03-10
., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J. This is a governmental contractor immunity case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137010 - 2015-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
on the lack of a valid “public use,” and the cases were consolidated. ¶5 DOT moved for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57071 - 2010-11-23
on the lack of a valid “public use,” and the cases were consolidated. ¶5 DOT moved for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57071 - 2010-11-23
Dave Flores v. Jack Raz
2002 WI App 27 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1104 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 27 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1104 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The parties tried the case, and on November 11, 2011, the trial court awarded Lamb “damages in the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89385 - 2012-11-19
The parties tried the case, and on November 11, 2011, the trial court awarded Lamb “damages in the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89385 - 2012-11-19