Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53531 - 53540 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 53531 - 53540 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777863 - 2024-03-20
an independent review of the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777863 - 2024-03-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP1461-CRNM 2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915839 - 2025-02-19
. No. 2024AP1461-CRNM 2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915839 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
State v. David B. Mattson
denial of their motions was based on precisely the same factual record regarding the actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12475 - 2017-09-21
denial of their motions was based on precisely the same factual record regarding the actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227136 - 2018-11-21
review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227136 - 2018-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this appeal. Erickson filed a responsive brief that establishes the following: facts in the record relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501705 - 2022-03-31
in this appeal. Erickson filed a responsive brief that establishes the following: facts in the record relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501705 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204678 - 2017-12-06
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204678 - 2017-12-06
[PDF]
State v. Roy E. Ridener
request. After considering the report and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9598 - 2017-09-19
request. After considering the report and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9598 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484186 - 2022-02-16
and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484186 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2025AP157 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1108482 - 2026-04-23
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2025AP157 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1108482 - 2026-04-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075754 - 2026-02-11
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075754 - 2026-02-11