Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53541 - 53550 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 53541 - 53550 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075754 - 2026-02-11
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075754 - 2026-02-11
[PDF]
Julie A. Kenyon v. Ralph C. Kenyon
if its decision is based on the facts appearing in the record and the appropriate and applicable law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5887 - 2017-09-19
if its decision is based on the facts appearing in the record and the appropriate and applicable law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5887 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Audrey Ann (Bricko) Yenter v. Andrew Kenneth Bricko
- of the initial divorce judgment. Because the record supports the trial court's finding, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9026 - 2017-09-19
- of the initial divorce judgment. Because the record supports the trial court's finding, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9026 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491853 - 2022-03-10
review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491853 - 2022-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280190 - 2020-08-19
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280190 - 2020-08-19
[PDF]
State v. Kaye D. Roberts
and knowing waiver of her right to testify. This court affirms. The parties agree that the trial record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9948 - 2017-09-19
and knowing waiver of her right to testify. This court affirms. The parties agree that the trial record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9948 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the record indicates the requirements of [D.J.W.] have not been satisfied.”2 Accordingly, the County has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466342 - 2021-12-23
as the record indicates the requirements of [D.J.W.] have not been satisfied.”2 Accordingly, the County has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466342 - 2021-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950351 - 2025-05-07
and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950351 - 2025-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237685 - 2019-03-20
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237685 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude at conference that these No. 2017AP1988
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234500 - 2019-02-07
upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude at conference that these No. 2017AP1988
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234500 - 2019-02-07