Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Ware
to charge a known crime because, as a parolee, he was not in actual physical custody of a police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14904 - 2017-09-21
to charge a known crime because, as a parolee, he was not in actual physical custody of a police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14904 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Troy J. Olmsted
, as a party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. 1 He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7108 - 2017-09-20
, as a party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. 1 He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7108 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of fifteen months in jail because of the dangerous weapon enhancer. A motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175696 - 2017-09-21
of fifteen months in jail because of the dangerous weapon enhancer. A motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175696 - 2017-09-21
State v. Troy J. Olmsted
postconviction motion.[1] He argues that his no contest plea was involuntary and unknowing because it was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] He argues that his no contest plea was involuntary and unknowing because it was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Form Summary
. Comments: The family code states that if the parties are joint petitioners, not everyone has to attend
/formdisplay/GF-175_summary.pdf?formNumber=GF-175&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-02-03
. Comments: The family code states that if the parties are joint petitioners, not everyone has to attend
/formdisplay/GF-175_summary.pdf?formNumber=GF-175&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Rao submitted a second set of interrogatories in October, 2004. The responses to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28612 - 2007-03-28
motion. Rao submitted a second set of interrogatories in October, 2004. The responses to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28612 - 2007-03-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
interrogatories and moved to compel discovery in July, 2004. The trial court granted his motion. Rao submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28612 - 2014-09-15
interrogatories and moved to compel discovery in July, 2004. The trial court granted his motion. Rao submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Comment on Supreme Court Rule petition 07-11
Joint Legislative Council’s Special Committee on State-Tribal Relations submitted a memorandum
/supreme/docs/0711commentnielsen3.pdf - 2015-10-01
Joint Legislative Council’s Special Committee on State-Tribal Relations submitted a memorandum
/supreme/docs/0711commentnielsen3.pdf - 2015-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Vernon L. Walker
, as party to a crime, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Walker raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7786 - 2017-09-19
, as party to a crime, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Walker raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7786 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the couple’s finances. The couple did not have a joint bank account; all of their money went into Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136570 - 2017-09-21
the couple’s finances. The couple did not have a joint bank account; all of their money went into Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136570 - 2017-09-21