Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Koeppen argues that the evidence adduced at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2760 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Koeppen argues that the evidence adduced at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 165
from the underlying liability issues. The court granted Mt. Morris’s motion and stayed discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56887 - 2014-09-15
from the underlying liability issues. The court granted Mt. Morris’s motion and stayed discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56887 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Troy J. Olmsted
, as a party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. 1 He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7108 - 2017-09-20
, as a party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. 1 He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7108 - 2017-09-20
State v. Troy J. Olmsted
postconviction motion.[1] He argues that his no contest plea was involuntary and unknowing because it was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] He argues that his no contest plea was involuntary and unknowing because it was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of fifteen months in jail because of the dangerous weapon enhancer. A motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175696 - 2017-09-21
of fifteen months in jail because of the dangerous weapon enhancer. A motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175696 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36014 - 2014-09-15
sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36014 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction order denying his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36014 - 2009-03-30
a postconviction order denying his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36014 - 2009-03-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion. Attorney Timothy O’Connell has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751644 - 2024-01-18
also appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion. Attorney Timothy O’Connell has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751644 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion. Attorney Timothy O’Connell has filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751644 - 2024-01-18
also appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion. Attorney Timothy O’Connell has filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751644 - 2024-01-18
State v. John R. Brunette
-Appellant. Opinion Filed: June 12, 1997 Submitted on Motion: May 9, 1997 JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11277 - 2005-03-31
-Appellant. Opinion Filed: June 12, 1997 Submitted on Motion: May 9, 1997 JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11277 - 2005-03-31