Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 29942 for des.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 971.31(10). We review questions involving the effect of a plea de novo. Kelty, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716537 - 2023-10-17
. STAT. § 971.31(10). We review questions involving the effect of a plea de novo. Kelty, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716537 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, while the mitigating factors were de minimis. No. 2021AP657-CR 5 In this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535788 - 2022-06-22
, while the mitigating factors were de minimis. No. 2021AP657-CR 5 In this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535788 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
WI APP 35
. As explained below, on our de novo review, we disagree. II. ¶6 A party is entitled to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46521 - 2014-09-15
. As explained below, on our de novo review, we disagree. II. ¶6 A party is entitled to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46521 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This appeal follows. ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
. This appeal follows. ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Slaughter, 200 Wis. 2d 190, 196, 546 N.W.2d 490 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29108 - 2007-05-16
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Slaughter, 200 Wis. 2d 190, 196, 546 N.W.2d 490 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29108 - 2007-05-16
[PDF]
WI APP 116
Statutory interpretation is a matter of law; we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122875 - 2014-12-08
Statutory interpretation is a matter of law; we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122875 - 2014-12-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
those facts constitute a deficiency or amount to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56323 - 2014-09-15
those facts constitute a deficiency or amount to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56323 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28680 - 2007-04-09
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28680 - 2007-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. 800.14(5), Stats., does not permit the circuit court to review the record de novo and to substitute its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118993 - 2014-08-06
. 800.14(5), Stats., does not permit the circuit court to review the record de novo and to substitute its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118993 - 2014-08-06