Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 64449 for records/1000.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 64449 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
and filed a response. After we considered the report, West’s response and independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15
and filed a response. After we considered the report, West’s response and independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4531 - 2017-09-19
court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4531 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170560 - 2017-09-21
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170560 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that Black’s claims in his postconviction motion are unsupported by the record. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32721 - 2014-09-15
that Black’s claims in his postconviction motion are unsupported by the record. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32721 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4529 - 2017-09-19
court’s order because the record contains no affidavit or other evidence which sets forth a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4529 - 2017-09-19
State v. Van L. Schwartz
a guilty plea because the record does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12070 - 2005-03-31
a guilty plea because the record does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Jackson’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036148 - 2025-11-11
review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Jackson’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036148 - 2025-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
in his postconviction motion are unsupported by the record. We therefore affirm the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32721 - 2008-05-19
in his postconviction motion are unsupported by the record. We therefore affirm the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32721 - 2008-05-19
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101903 - 2013-09-16
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101903 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Van L. Schwartz
that there was no factual basis to support a guilty plea because the record does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12070 - 2017-09-21
that there was no factual basis to support a guilty plea because the record does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12070 - 2017-09-21