Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53631 - 53640 of 82591 for simple case.
Search results 53631 - 53640 of 82591 for simple case.
CA Blank Order
to this appeal. Bond had also been placed in an unrelated case on April 5, 2013, and one condition required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139180 - 2015-04-06
to this appeal. Bond had also been placed in an unrelated case on April 5, 2013, and one condition required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139180 - 2015-04-06
CA Blank Order
confinement and five years of extended supervision after his probation was revoked. The appeal in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119691 - 2014-08-17
confinement and five years of extended supervision after his probation was revoked. The appeal in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119691 - 2014-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and to dismiss and read in charges in a separate case. The State also agreed to cap its recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483780 - 2022-02-17
and to dismiss and read in charges in a separate case. The State also agreed to cap its recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483780 - 2022-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
concedes this was error, based on a case holding that codefendant guilty pleas are inadmissible hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84404 - 2012-07-04
concedes this was error, based on a case holding that codefendant guilty pleas are inadmissible hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84404 - 2012-07-04
CA Blank Order
(the Village). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139536 - 2015-04-14
(the Village). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139536 - 2015-04-14
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1106765 - 2026-04-15
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1106765 - 2026-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP48-CRNM 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251185 - 2019-12-09
. No. 2018AP48-CRNM 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251185 - 2019-12-09
State v. Steven T. Miller
revocation because, at the time of sentencing in the instant case, he had not yet begun serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
revocation because, at the time of sentencing in the instant case, he had not yet begun serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
St. Croix Rod and Gun Club, Inc., (the club). We remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63932 - 2014-09-15
St. Croix Rod and Gun Club, Inc., (the club). We remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63932 - 2014-09-15