Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53661 - 53670 of 60842 for divorce form s.

[PDF] Incentives and sanctions reference guide
of the charge(s) or vacation of a guilty plea Reduction in the charge(s) Reduction of the sentence
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/incentivesanctions.pdf - 2025-10-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of factors: (1) “the nature and circumstances of the crime[s]” (“index offenses”); (2) “the person’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242489 - 2019-06-20

State v. Warren Goodman
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Diane S. Sykes, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14600 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 97
of the appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs S. A. Schapiro of Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64703 - 2014-09-15

Jessica J.L. v. State
counseling. Munoz’s defense was that the sexual contact had been consensual. Therefore he argued that: [s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12470 - 2005-03-31

City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee
appeal. See Wis. Stat. § 227.53(1) (A person “aggrieved by a decision specified in s. 227.52 shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5468 - 2005-03-31

Gogebic-Iron Wastewater Authority v. C.D. Smith Construction, Inc.
jurisdiction of the subject matter has jurisdiction over a person served in an action pursuant to s. 801.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14653 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and what effects such a ruling would have on the proceedings.” Casper v. American Int’l S. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267192 - 2020-07-07

Adam P. Read v. Susan Riseling
. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Case No. 96-2916 Alyson J. Berowitz, and Stephen S. Berowitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11561 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
their injuries. The court agreed with the Kistners and denied Schroeder’s motion, citing § 174.02(1)(b)’s plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28