Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53671 - 53680 of 60865 for divorce form s.

SCR CHAPTER 12
litem pursuant to s. 803.01(3) of the statutes if the court has reason to believe that the attorney
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79759 - 2012-03-15

John A. Austin, M.D. v. Mercy Health System Corporation
." The ICU committee also "[r]eview[s] and recommend[s] policies for the operation and utilization
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8235 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John D. Tiggs, Jr. v. Grant County Circuit Court
. GRANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT AND THE HONORABLE GEORGE S. CURRY, PRESIDING, RESPONDENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6157 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(1977)). Accordingly, “[s]entence credit is designed to afford fairness so that a person does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=506593 - 2022-04-12

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 12-03 amended
would constitute a forfeiture under s. 905.03(5). This protection is waived as to any material
/supreme/docs/1203petitionamend.pdf - 2012-10-22

[PDF] Incentives and sanctions reference guide
of the charge(s) or vacation of a guilty plea Reduction in the charge(s) Reduction of the sentence
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/incentivesanctions.pdf - 2025-10-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of factors: (1) “the nature and circumstances of the crime[s]” (“index offenses”); (2) “the person’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242489 - 2019-06-20

[PDF] WI App 97
of the appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs S. A. Schapiro of Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64703 - 2014-09-15

Jessica J.L. v. State
counseling. Munoz’s defense was that the sexual contact had been consensual. Therefore he argued that: [s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12470 - 2005-03-31

City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee
appeal. See Wis. Stat. § 227.53(1) (A person “aggrieved by a decision specified in s. 227.52 shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5468 - 2005-03-31