Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
characterization that this is a “simple and straightforward contract action,” such that we should accord de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214776 - 2018-06-27
characterization that this is a “simple and straightforward contract action,” such that we should accord de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214776 - 2018-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violates Jackson’s right to confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176615 - 2017-09-21
violates Jackson’s right to confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176615 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This appeal follows. ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
. This appeal follows. ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Kevin G. Vinje
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9127 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9127 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous view of the law, we will consider the legal question de novo. See Gohde v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46215 - 2014-09-15
erroneous view of the law, we will consider the legal question de novo. See Gohde v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46215 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 116
Statutory interpretation is a matter of law; we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122875 - 2014-12-08
Statutory interpretation is a matter of law; we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122875 - 2014-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
turns on a question of law, however, we review the legal question de novo. Id. The circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114770 - 2017-09-21
turns on a question of law, however, we review the legal question de novo. Id. The circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114770 - 2017-09-21
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04