Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 24458 for extending.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 24458 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
eligibility for extended supervision. The circuit court, the Honorable Robert A. Kennedy presiding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86269 - 2014-09-15
eligibility for extended supervision. The circuit court, the Honorable Robert A. Kennedy presiding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86269 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and fifteen years of extended supervision. ¶3 Kerner filed a postconviction motion. Kerner argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91732 - 2014-09-15
and fifteen years of extended supervision. ¶3 Kerner filed a postconviction motion. Kerner argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91732 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 36
STARK, P.J. Catherine1 appeals from an order extending her involuntary commitment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527105 - 2022-09-21
STARK, P.J. Catherine1 appeals from an order extending her involuntary commitment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527105 - 2022-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. ¶12 Salsbury, represented by new counsel, filed a postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92144 - 2013-01-28
of extended supervision. ¶12 Salsbury, represented by new counsel, filed a postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92144 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
vehicle became unreasonable because it was extended beyond what was necessary to effectuate the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174189 - 2017-09-21
vehicle became unreasonable because it was extended beyond what was necessary to effectuate the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174189 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 82
with DC 48, in which the Rule of 75 was extended to employees represented by the union who had become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201069 - 2017-12-29
with DC 48, in which the Rule of 75 was extended to employees represented by the union who had become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201069 - 2017-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
sentences, including: (1) seven years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68309 - 2011-07-25
sentences, including: (1) seven years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68309 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Kovac did not file a notice of intent to appeal. A.B. filed a pro se motion to extend the time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171476 - 2017-09-21
Kovac did not file a notice of intent to appeal. A.B. filed a pro se motion to extend the time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171476 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision, and is currently incarcerated. Nos. 2021AP2035 2021AP2036 2021AP2037
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485107 - 2022-02-22
of extended supervision, and is currently incarcerated. Nos. 2021AP2035 2021AP2036 2021AP2037
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485107 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which would extend the time she had to appeal, even though it was labeled as a motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413135 - 2021-08-19
, which would extend the time she had to appeal, even though it was labeled as a motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413135 - 2021-08-19