Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 56454 for n y c.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 56454 for n y c.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3570 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. Hammill
, the following exchange occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21
, the following exchange occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inconsistent statement, the “declarant” must “testif[y] at trial … and [be] subject to cross- examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380418 - 2021-06-29
inconsistent statement, the “declarant” must “testif[y] at trial … and [be] subject to cross- examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380418 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in his or [another’s] defense” and that “[b]y not properly instructing the jury, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112660 - 2017-09-21
in his or [another’s] defense” and that “[b]y not properly instructing the jury, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112660 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with the victim’s rights requirements, the State advised that the victim, Jennifer Y., did not respond to the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
with the victim’s rights requirements, the State advised that the victim, Jennifer Y., did not respond to the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 548 N.W.2d 817 (1996). Prokop’s testimony at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
, 548 N.W.2d 817 (1996). Prokop’s testimony at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
WI App 136 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2952-CR Complete Ti...
court instructed the jury to consider each charge separately, stating “[y]our verdict for the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89255 - 2012-12-18
court instructed the jury to consider each charge separately, stating “[y]our verdict for the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89255 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Raymond A. Rosa
verdict. The trial court went on to state: No. 03-3199-CR 8 [Y]our conduct on this particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7089 - 2017-09-20
verdict. The trial court went on to state: No. 03-3199-CR 8 [Y]our conduct on this particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7089 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3568 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3568 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3571 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3571 - 2017-09-19