Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 64954 for or b.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 64954 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
In the matter of the guardianship and protective placement of Barbara B.: North Central Community Services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29349 - 2007-06-11
In the matter of the guardianship and protective placement of Barbara B.: North Central Community Services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29349 - 2007-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and one count of exposing genitals to a child. First-degree sexual assault of a child is a Class B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209108 - 2018-03-01
, and one count of exposing genitals to a child. First-degree sexual assault of a child is a Class B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209108 - 2018-03-01
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Sweat
history of § 973.09(1)(b), STATS.,3 to hold that a restitution order is unaffected by bankruptcy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
history of § 973.09(1)(b), STATS.,3 to hold that a restitution order is unaffected by bankruptcy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
Richard J. Schwarten v. Leslie Smith
a rebuttable presumption of a substantial change in circumstances. Sec. 767.32(1)(b)2. ¶6 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5461 - 2005-03-31
a rebuttable presumption of a substantial change in circumstances. Sec. 767.32(1)(b)2. ¶6 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5461 - 2005-03-31
Waushara County v. Richard Mack
)(b), Stats. Richard Mack appeals from a judgment and orders issued in a civil forfeiture action. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31
)(b), Stats. Richard Mack appeals from a judgment and orders issued in a civil forfeiture action. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Richard Mack
. Affirmed. DYKMAN, J. This is a single-judge appeal decided pursuant to § 752.31(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8019 - 2017-09-19
. Affirmed. DYKMAN, J. This is a single-judge appeal decided pursuant to § 752.31(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8019 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
David L. Nichols v. Charles D. Wingrove
at the noticed hearing. Relying on WIS. STAT. § 785.01(1)(b),2 the trial court found Nichols in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3357 - 2017-09-19
at the noticed hearing. Relying on WIS. STAT. § 785.01(1)(b),2 the trial court found Nichols in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3357 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
entitlement to counsel under the constitution or laws of the United States or this state) with § 977.05(6)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11669 - 2017-09-19
entitlement to counsel under the constitution or laws of the United States or this state) with § 977.05(6)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11669 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence under § 806.07(1)(b) and WIS. STAT. § 805.15(3); and she was denied her right to counsel under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35479 - 2014-09-15
evidence under § 806.07(1)(b) and WIS. STAT. § 805.15(3); and she was denied her right to counsel under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35479 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(a), 346.63(1)(b), 346.13(1), and 346.34(1)(b), following a traffic stop on January 15, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135400 - 2015-02-18
(1)(a), 346.63(1)(b), 346.13(1), and 346.34(1)(b), following a traffic stop on January 15, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135400 - 2015-02-18