Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53701 - 53710 of 69819 for hi.
Search results 53701 - 53710 of 69819 for hi.
State v. James L. Wright
. . . . . [T]he state does not believe that it can argue in good faith that Wright entered his plea
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16704 - 2005-03-31
. . . . . [T]he state does not believe that it can argue in good faith that Wright entered his plea
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16704 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. In Haffenbredl’s response letter, he appears to ask for his case to be reviewed and reduced from a felony charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107850 - 2014-08-18
. In Haffenbredl’s response letter, he appears to ask for his case to be reviewed and reduced from a felony charge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107850 - 2014-08-18
State v. Gilbert J. Grobstick
basis for his conviction for felony escape, the unobjected-to-instructional error did not prevent
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7845 - 2005-03-31
basis for his conviction for felony escape, the unobjected-to-instructional error did not prevent
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7845 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from a judgment convicting him of child enticement. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627435 - 2023-03-01
from a judgment convicting him of child enticement. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627435 - 2023-03-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
robbery, both as a party to a crime. His appointed appellate counsel, Attorney Michael S. Holzman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163996 - 2017-09-21
robbery, both as a party to a crime. His appointed appellate counsel, Attorney Michael S. Holzman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163996 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jesse L. Halverson
a nonfinal order[1] denying his motion to be tried in juvenile court for first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14159 - 2005-03-31
a nonfinal order[1] denying his motion to be tried in juvenile court for first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14159 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Phiffer appeals a circuit court order that denied his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101816 - 2013-09-08
Phiffer appeals a circuit court order that denied his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101816 - 2013-09-08
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139103 - 2015-04-07
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139103 - 2015-04-07
CA Blank Order
and this court advised him of his right to file a response. Grigsby has not responded. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132987 - 2008-10-26
and this court advised him of his right to file a response. Grigsby has not responded. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132987 - 2008-10-26
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
for his injuries without any legal obligation to do so and was therefore a volunteer payor, to whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15434 - 2005-03-31
for his injuries without any legal obligation to do so and was therefore a volunteer payor, to whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15434 - 2005-03-31