Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53711 - 53720 of 83161 for case code.
Search results 53711 - 53720 of 83161 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS
prosecution of the case. We reject the argument. ¶4 Kypke argues that the court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34664 - 2008-11-19
prosecution of the case. We reject the argument. ¶4 Kypke argues that the court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34664 - 2008-11-19
CA Blank Order
, as in the present case, the same judge presides at both proceedings, we will consider the original sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113660 - 2014-06-03
, as in the present case, the same judge presides at both proceedings, we will consider the original sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113660 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
history of the case and addresses the validity of Schultz’s plea and sentence. Schultz was informed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052528 - 2025-12-23
history of the case and addresses the validity of Schultz’s plea and sentence. Schultz was informed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052528 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty and was convicted in the Plymouth case on October 11, 2011. On November 2, 2011, Krahn appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92108 - 2013-01-29
guilty and was convicted in the Plymouth case on October 11, 2011. On November 2, 2011, Krahn appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92108 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
State v. James J. Baeten
to the intercourse. On the evidence presented in this case, it would be unreasonable for the jury to doubt the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9565 - 2017-09-19
to the intercourse. On the evidence presented in this case, it would be unreasonable for the jury to doubt the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9565 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180905 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435191 - 2021-10-06
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435191 - 2021-10-06
Patricia Marshall Scales v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
-and-fall case. Wal-Mart claims the trial court erred in taxing costs against it because the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16125 - 2005-03-31
-and-fall case. Wal-Mart claims the trial court erred in taxing costs against it because the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
that the sentences were impermissibly disparate. Perez, 170 Wis.2d at 144, 487 N.W.2d at 635. Leniency in one case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
that the sentences were impermissibly disparate. Perez, 170 Wis.2d at 144, 487 N.W.2d at 635. Leniency in one case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133448 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133448 - 2017-09-21