Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53721 - 53730 of 83164 for case code.
Search results 53721 - 53730 of 83164 for case code.
State v. Tavares James Rosemond
1280. Rosemond argues that the evidence in this case showed that he moved the victim between three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21564 - 2006-02-27
1280. Rosemond argues that the evidence in this case showed that he moved the victim between three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21564 - 2006-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605636 - 2022-12-29
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605636 - 2022-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP85 2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257785 - 2020-04-21
. No. 2019AP85 2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257785 - 2020-04-21
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97661 - 2013-06-04
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97661 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173685 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173685 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jo Anne M.(Holl) Kline v. Ralph A. Kloehn, M.D.
judgment dismissing the case because it concluded that the statute of limitations had expired. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9370 - 2017-09-19
judgment dismissing the case because it concluded that the statute of limitations had expired. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9370 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jason J. Simonis
to trial had he been able to try his case before another judge. He pleaded no contest simply to reduce his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12633 - 2005-03-31
to trial had he been able to try his case before another judge. He pleaded no contest simply to reduce his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025974 - 2025-10-23
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025974 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145382 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145382 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a copy of the report, and Danielson filed a response. We conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604683 - 2022-12-29
with a copy of the report, and Danielson filed a response. We conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604683 - 2022-12-29