Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53731 - 53740 of 83195 for case code.
Search results 53731 - 53740 of 83195 for case code.
[PDF]
Lois Wimmer v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
order dismissing her case for lack of jurisdiction. The issue is whether the trial court attained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11182 - 2017-09-19
order dismissing her case for lack of jurisdiction. The issue is whether the trial court attained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11182 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204946 - 2017-12-13
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204946 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report sets forth the history of the case and addresses the lack of procedural defects, the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249327 - 2019-10-29
report sets forth the history of the case and addresses the lack of procedural defects, the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249327 - 2019-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435191 - 2021-10-06
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435191 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the plea colloquy. The Odom appeal was voluntarily dismissed before oral argument. This case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218627 - 2018-08-31
the plea colloquy. The Odom appeal was voluntarily dismissed before oral argument. This case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218627 - 2018-08-31
CA Blank Order
, as in the present case, the same judge presides at both proceedings, we will consider the original sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113660 - 2014-06-03
, as in the present case, the same judge presides at both proceedings, we will consider the original sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113660 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the case.” Id., ¶20 (footnote omitted). We are satisfied the no-merit procedure warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33622 - 2014-09-15
of the case.” Id., ¶20 (footnote omitted). We are satisfied the no-merit procedure warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33622 - 2014-09-15
Patricia Marshall Scales v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
-and-fall case. Wal-Mart claims the trial court erred in taxing costs against it because the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16125 - 2005-03-31
-and-fall case. Wal-Mart claims the trial court erred in taxing costs against it because the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismiss and read in the remaining counts from this case and a traffic forfeiture case. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700692 - 2023-09-13
dismiss and read in the remaining counts from this case and a traffic forfeiture case. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=700692 - 2023-09-13
State v. Jackson County Board of Adjustment
an “unnecessary hardship.” Such hardship exists in cases involving minimum setbacks from navigable waters only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5397 - 2005-03-31
an “unnecessary hardship.” Such hardship exists in cases involving minimum setbacks from navigable waters only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5397 - 2005-03-31