Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5381 - 5390 of 63485 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5381 - 5390 of 63485 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. James W. McMillen
. The trial court concluded that the statement was voluntary and that McMillen was not in custody at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8360 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court concluded that the statement was voluntary and that McMillen was not in custody at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8360 - 2017-09-19
State v. James W. McMillen
and that McMillen was not in custody at the time. To the extent a trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8360 - 2005-03-31
and that McMillen was not in custody at the time. To the extent a trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leroy Bryant
was at the home. The police entered the home with a K-9 unit and took Bryant into custody. Bryant’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14243 - 2014-09-15
was at the home. The police entered the home with a K-9 unit and took Bryant into custody. Bryant’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James A. Poh
.1 James Poh appeals an order which denied his motion for sentence credit for a period during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15361 - 2017-09-21
.1 James Poh appeals an order which denied his motion for sentence credit for a period during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15361 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven D. Cathey
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The requested postconviction relief was a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11189 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The requested postconviction relief was a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11189 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Villalobos
in a Kenosha County prosecution. Villalobos contends that a portion of his presentence custody in Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8089 - 2005-03-31
in a Kenosha County prosecution. Villalobos contends that a portion of his presentence custody in Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Villalobos
custody in Racine County relating to a Racine County prosecution should have been credited to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8089 - 2017-09-19
custody in Racine County relating to a Racine County prosecution should have been credited to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8089 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the bench warrant. However, Glover remained in custody on November 8, 2007 and November 9, 2007, until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36913 - 2014-09-15
the bench warrant. However, Glover remained in custody on November 8, 2007 and November 9, 2007, until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36913 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, Glover remained in custody on November 8, 2007 and November 9, 2007, until she was released from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36913 - 2009-06-24
. However, Glover remained in custody on November 8, 2007 and November 9, 2007, until she was released from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36913 - 2009-06-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
guilty after the trial court denied his suppression motion.2 ¶2 In challenging the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46199 - 2014-09-15
guilty after the trial court denied his suppression motion.2 ¶2 In challenging the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46199 - 2014-09-15