Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5381 - 5390 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5381 - 5390 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Nathan Gillis v. Gary McCaughtry
injury as a result. See id. at 9. The de minimus use of force is excluded from constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13957 - 2014-09-15
injury as a result. See id. at 9. The de minimus use of force is excluded from constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13957 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49540 - 2014-09-15
an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49540 - 2014-09-15
Dave Flores v. Jack Raz
, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2013-09-18
, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2013-09-18
[PDF]
Ronnie Prophet v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, Inc.
. II. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15296 - 2017-09-21
. II. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15296 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leon J. Lace
(1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standards regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3940 - 2014-01-23
(1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standards regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3940 - 2014-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Uebelacker’s claims. ¶8 Uebelacker appeals.4 DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a summary judgment decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917441 - 2025-02-20
Uebelacker’s claims. ¶8 Uebelacker appeals.4 DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a summary judgment decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917441 - 2025-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decision is de novo, but we use the same method as the circuit court. See Pinter v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96750 - 2013-05-13
judgment decision is de novo, but we use the same method as the circuit court. See Pinter v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96750 - 2013-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Daymon D. Tate
, subject to de novo review. See id., 131 Wis.2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. The trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13296 - 2017-09-21
, subject to de novo review. See id., 131 Wis.2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. The trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13296 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Otmar Rabas v. Claim Management Services, Inc.
. We conduct a de novo review of a motion for summary judgment using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8940 - 2017-09-19
. We conduct a de novo review of a motion for summary judgment using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8940 - 2017-09-19
Carole L. Arenz v. Leo J. Bronston
review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14008 - 2005-03-31
review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14008 - 2005-03-31