Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5381 - 5390 of 29942 for des.

Wieting Funeral Home of Chilton, Inc. v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Company
discuss each issue. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo by applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7319 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
establishing a prima facie case for summary judgment. ¶27 This court reviews summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78840 - 2012-02-29

Joann Katzman v. State of Wisconsin Ethics Board
of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14595 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2017AP1150 2017AP1151 8 Supreme Court Rules, questions of law we review de novo. Radloff v. General
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206242 - 2017-12-27

National Motorists Association v. Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
of statutory construction, issues of law, which we review de novo. However, we may give varying degrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4978 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
consolidated the appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58403 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Anne Marie Rosplock v. David Rosplock
for a reduction or suspension of maintenance. David sought and received a de novo hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11816 - 2017-09-21

Otto Wolter v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
legal conclusion, we should use the lowest standard, de novo, because this is a case of first impression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15247 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 61
-CR 6 ¶10 Determining the intent of the legislature is a matter of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171899 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether any deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378548 - 2021-06-22