Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5381 - 5390 of 63224 for records.
Search results 5381 - 5390 of 63224 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Appellate counsel provided a copy of the no-merit report, along with copies of the appellate record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662265 - 2023-05-31
). Appellate counsel provided a copy of the no-merit report, along with copies of the appellate record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662265 - 2023-05-31
Michael R. Wolfe v. Nathen Saloch
Protection rules. Because it is not clear from the record exactly what constitutes the $389 damage figure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9719 - 2005-03-31
Protection rules. Because it is not clear from the record exactly what constitutes the $389 damage figure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9719 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
the evidence that Sahs relies upon does not appear in the record, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
the evidence that Sahs relies upon does not appear in the record, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, but he did not do so.2 Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992795 - 2025-08-05
right to file a response, but he did not do so.2 Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992795 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178974 - 2017-09-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178974 - 2017-09-21
State v. James M.C.
the facts of record with the factors in § 938.18(5), Stats., taking into account the protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13335 - 2005-03-31
the facts of record with the factors in § 938.18(5), Stats., taking into account the protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497277 - 2022-03-22
a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497277 - 2022-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude No. 2019AP2005-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366597 - 2021-05-13
for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude No. 2019AP2005-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366597 - 2021-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Paul P.
only `on the record' for good cause," the State's argument must fail because it had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11018 - 2017-09-19
only `on the record' for good cause," the State's argument must fail because it had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11018 - 2017-09-19