Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53861 - 53870 of 68259 for law.

Amy Jo Humphreys v. Roy G. Bridgeman
of law. See Padgett v. Szczesny, 138 Wis. 2d 150, 154, 405 N.W.2d 714 (Ct. App. 1987). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15937 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael L. Coltrane
on the appropriate and applicable law.” Id. (citation omitted). “A circuit court should freely allow a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19167 - 2005-08-01

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Claurice T.
the relevant facts are undisputed presents a question of law, which we review de novo. April O., 233 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6734 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. George A. King
. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). On appeal, the issues are both fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8173 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is satisfied. ¶13 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of law and fact. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80692 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
justifications for leaving the process of applying law to fact to the trial court.’” Byrge, 237 Wis. 2d 197
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255534 - 2020-03-03

[PDF] WI App 81
, 681 N.W.2d 110. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=302407 - 2021-01-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Street Antigo, WI 54409 Angela Dawn Henderson Law Office of Angela Dawn Henderson 309 High
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206853 - 2018-01-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
would follow the law as instructed by the trial court instead of following his or her own concept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89386 - 2014-09-15

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Shannon K.
of the law, then Shannon’s trial counsel was not deficient in not making this argument to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3777 - 2005-03-31