Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53861 - 53870 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 53861 - 53870 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. (The defendant conferring with attorney off the record.) THE DEFENDANT: Excuse me, your Honor? THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73674 - 2014-09-15
. (The defendant conferring with attorney off the record.) THE DEFENDANT: Excuse me, your Honor? THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73674 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the contract. To the contrary, the jury found that Phenco did not breach the contract. Further, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64767 - 2014-09-15
the contract. To the contrary, the jury found that Phenco did not breach the contract. Further, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64767 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with Stauner, he returned to his squad car and performed a records check, which indicated that Stauner “had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10
with Stauner, he returned to his squad car and performed a records check, which indicated that Stauner “had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10
State v. Carolyn G.
indicating trial would occur on that date. The record reflects that Carolyn was previously advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5012 - 2005-03-31
indicating trial would occur on that date. The record reflects that Carolyn was previously advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5012 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
., ¶30. In addition, we may independently review the record to determine if it provides a further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50883 - 2014-09-15
., ¶30. In addition, we may independently review the record to determine if it provides a further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, but on the alternative ground that the record conclusively demonstrates that Wolfe is not entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49029 - 2014-09-15
, but on the alternative ground that the record conclusively demonstrates that Wolfe is not entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Sec. 805.17. Because the record does not include a transcript of the hearing underlying the March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281452 - 2020-08-25
.” Sec. 805.17. Because the record does not include a transcript of the hearing underlying the March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281452 - 2020-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing, concluding that the record of the plea proceeding refuted Graham’s contentions.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
without a hearing, concluding that the record of the plea proceeding refuted Graham’s contentions.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099954 - 2026-04-08
. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099954 - 2026-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
to be to postconviction counsel’s conduct. We affirm, but on the alternative ground that the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49029 - 2010-04-20
to be to postconviction counsel’s conduct. We affirm, but on the alternative ground that the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49029 - 2010-04-20